German Nazi Racism is Still Alive and Well

I’m sure most of us remember the 1936 Olympics.  The horrific event when Nazi Germany attempted to snatch gold medals in sports from citizens of the civilized world.  At this Olympics, the racist Germans used sports as a propagada showcase to attempt to prove racist theories on supposed “Aryan” superiority.

Apparently their attitude hasn’t changed much.  Not content to leave racism at home, these hate-filled German monsters arrogantly defeated an African team on their own soil, adding a touch of colonialism to their stolen victory.  Is this not the same display of hatred that was shown by Adolf Hitler towards people of African descent?  African people have never harmed Germans on German soil, and have even been willing to put aside racist rhetoric that is echoed ad naseum by the Whites, especially Germans.  It’s clear that they have a vendetta against people with a different skin color.

Germany must be punished.  Their win must be annulled immediately and Ghana should replace them as the winners of this match.

Advertisements

Unpatriotic Conservatives

Despite being socially liberal, I have many friends, mostly older people (such as my former mentor Meir) who are members of the Republican Party.  And we agree on more than a few issues, ranging from foreign policy to some domestic issues.  Generally, most liberals oppose the War in Iraq (as I did when Bush was in office), and most conservatives are for it.

There has been something that has been deeply troubling to me since the election of President Barack Obama, a issue that twists and tortures my mind, because of its insidious and vile nature, which if left unchecked, will threaten peace both at home and abroad.  If these people have their way, entire nations may be wiped from the face of the earth, chaos will reign, our freedoms will be squashed under the totalitarian boot of hate, and our way of life as we know it will come to an abrupt end, signaling the destruction of everything that we have ever held dear.  I am talking of course about unpatriotic conservatives.  Perhaps “conservatives” is too kind a word, as they are not in any way within the ranks of the Republican Party – perhaps “right-wing extremists” would be better.

You see these people every day.  Within the ranks of the Tea Party or the 9-11 truthers.  Those who criticize Obama at every turn, abusing the Constitution for their own wicked ends.  We see them in the press, in ugly voices such as Justin Raimondo, Lew Rockwell, or Patrick Buchanan and in academia by people like Dinesh D’Souza.  They aspire to “take over” the Republican party and to replace it with something even more extreme than what we are already seeing from them.  Should they ever attain power, they would like, for starters, to scrap the American commitment to maintaining peace in the Middle East – a tradition since the 1950’s, and force America into an isolationist turtle shell of fear.  And should they be successful in this, our social values of tolerance will take a hit as well.  Blacks will oscillate from every tree in the south, illuminated not by electric lighting but by flaming crosses.  Gays will be burned in the streets has heretics, and the Pope will probably have the final word on what goes on in America.

I don’t want that world.  I prefer America the beautiful, America the diverse, not the AmeriKKKa of some post-apocalyptic theocratic police state which comes from the dreams of bigots and right-wing extremists.

The paleoconservatives’ (as they like to be called) dictatorial inclinations convince me of only one thing: that Paleoconservatives have conceived the project of reigning over opinions and of conquering neither kingdoms nor provinces but the human mind. If this project succeeds then all the people within this sinister organization will be free to control us.  Even worse, it will be illegal for anyone to say anything about how pathological, insensate blatherskites are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the “poeta nascitur, non fit” that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that if the paleocons can one day castigate whomever they oppose then the long descent into night is sure to follow.

Probably the only people in the world who share the worldview of the paleocons are the terrorists whom America is fighting in the middle east.  Which is why they go to such lengths to defend the moral implications of terror.  Our top priority MUST be to take a strong position on Paleocons attack on morals, which, after all, erode constitutional principles that have shaped our society and remain at the core of our freedom and liberty.  And what better way to do this than to support everything that they oppose, and oppose everything that they support?  We will also be fighting the terrorists when they do this.

So let’s band together.  Let us sound out our resounding cry for women’s rights and feminism, for abortions, for gay rights and gay marriages.  Let us voice our support for full freedom of speech, and let cartoons of Muhammad be broadcast back-to-back with vivacious TV shows.  Let us show the strength of our diversity – men of all colors arm in arm, hand to hand, shoulder to shoulder, body to body.  Anyone refusing or condemning this shows his true colors – I question as a dhimmi in league with Islamic extremism, an enemy of Western civilization, of freedom, and of America.

Prop 8 Tries to Annul Marriages

Remember when Prop 8 backers said they wouldn’t target existing marriages?

Well, it turns out that they lied. They lied, because they knew their plan all along.  A plan to oppress the LGBT communities of America, to spit on our sacred Constitution which is beloved by so many.

What typical homophobic paranoia and mental hate. Prop 8 should never have been brought to the ballot anyways. There was too much room for electoral fraud and intimidation, and I am sure that Christian fundamentalist agitators knew this (thus the reason why it was taken to the ballot in the 1st place) It should have been settled diplomatically in the halls of California’s legislature.

The majority should never be able to dictate the will of the minority. It is in fact incumbent on the majority to protect the rights of the minority. To help them to give them what they need to achieve equality.

Here we have an interesting little character known as the Homophobe. The Homophobe wants us to think of him as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that he wants to “do good” at the expense of other people’s lives. If the Homophobe really wanted to be a do-gooder, he could start by admitting that we can no longer afford to do nothing about his lazy tactics. Instead, we must strike while the iron is hot and replace today’s chaos and lack of vision with order and a supreme sense of purpose.

To put a little finer edge on the concept, the Homophobe’s list of sins is long and each one deserves more space than I have here. Therefore, rather than describe each one individually, I’ll summarize by stating that his idiotic claim that courtesy and manners don’t count for anything is just that, an idiotic claim. The purpose of this deception may be to fill the air with recrimination and rancor. Or maybe the purpose is to damage the self esteem and mental health of millions of young men and women.

The Homophobe ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you’re not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person. This may be a foregone conclusion, but I’m not very conversant with his background. To be quite frank, I don’t care to be. I already know enough to state with confidence that the Homophobe has been trying hard to protect what has become a lucrative racket for him. Unfortunately, that lucrative racket has a hard-to-overlook consequence: it will shatter and ultimately destroy our most precious possessions some day. Perhaps I’m reading too much into his double standards, but they don’t seem to serve any purpose other than to strap us down with a network of rules and regulations. This probably does not affect your daily life, but it is a fact: the homophobes must be stopped, by force if necessary.  Be sure to inform your local chapter of the ADL or SPLC if you see such people in life.  Together, united – we will never be defeated!

Hating the needy is still hating

I was walking down the busiest street yesterday, and I noticed an old man in ragged clothing was sitting down on the sidewalk and leaning against the ruddy, cracked bricks that formed the wall of a building. I approached quietly, my shadow overcasting his body. He did not look up at me, but continued to stare down at the ground, acknowledging my existence only by the shadow I casted.

“Sir,” he pleaded in a quavering voice while evading eye contact, “could you please spare a coupla’ dollars? I’m a hungry man and I’ve beena bit down on my luck.”

He then looked up at me, his face gave signs of being used to humiliation and mockery. This was the face of a man who was acquainted with tough times, and the kindness of strangers was his highest providence. Every day he starved, alone in the alleyways as an outcast of society; no family would feed him, no one to shelter this kindly old man. Cold and grim winters he fought with all his endurance, sleeping under bridges without a second thought to discomfort. He was a survivor, I could see. His expression was near emotionless, save for the scarcest hint of hope–hope that even the barest fragment of human kindness still existed. I was destined to console his hope, to nurture it like a mother to a baby.

“Well, I can spare a few dollars,” I said with a slight hint of a foreboding tone. He falsely perceived sarcasm, and his face contorted into humiliation until I pulled out my wallet. Then, I gave him a twenty-dollar bill and winked at him. His face lit up like a menorah, and tears of joy streamed onto my back from his tight hugging. He thanked me, while still hugging me, and told me that G-D would bless me my entire life. He then began running to what I presume was the nearest grocery store; though on his way he turned around, looked back at me, smiled, and ran into the distance never to be seen by me again. While a heartwarming story, a question I have must be answered: Why was this man not nurtured by the government? He existed as an emotionless creature until my saintly deed, for perhaps years or even decades: far too long. Our governments exist to protect The People, to ensure mutual survival and humanity’s success as a team. Governments, when they do not fulfill their intended purpose, become selfish and decry their part in the social contract. Our values have been corrupted by the atrocious, the maligners of modern civilization; people are not accepted for who they are, but must merely be useful to the current regime that controls their lives. The self-important types ignore the obligation of giving people what is rightfully theirs, and keep it for their own self-important purposes.

And to speak of the mindset of these people; they hate democracy and all that is good. They hate kindness and charity. Only they want to be ahead, for in their psychology they are narcissistic and megalomaniac; these vipers hold down and prohibit equality for grandiose visions of worship. My own philosophy has me motivated to do more than sit back and wiggle my finger; I want to actually DO something to correct this malady. Most people will read my words, nod their heads, and then go buy something on ebay without a care in the world. No. Do *something*, even if it is seemingly insignificant; starting is the thickest barrier, we we must overcome inertia.

Imagine a world of social equality, where race, class, religion, sexual orientation, gender, and education are not barriers.  We can achieve this if we push for the bettering of “inferior peoples”, for no longer would there be economic dividers.  Social injustices will too be deprecated, for accepting the need of charity to the needy is one of liberalism and tolerance.  All people are thinking beings, capable of loving another human.  And should we deny life to such people?  Disregard equality and promote suffering?  I hope none think as this.  But as long as there are capable people who ignore our efforts to give a hand out to those who require it, there will be spitters and sociopaths.

A Victory for Free Speech

http://www.jewishjournal.com/community/article/uc_irvine_suspends_muslim_student_group_20100614/

This is splendid news.  I cannot say how happy I am that the anti-semitic Arabs were punished for their hate.  Too often, the American community is focused on what white racists do to blacks, and sometimes ignores what is being done to innocent Jewish people just for being Jewish.  We can only hope that other colleges follow suit with the same ideas.  I would, in fact go so far as to say that all Muslim groups, and even some Christian groups need to be banned from campuses nationwide, as many Muslim and Christian ideologies tend to be authoritarian and undemocratic.

Some people might ask, “isn’t banning someone from campus against free speech?” No.  Because hate speech is not free speech.  Let us remember that hate has consequences.  The consequence of  using anti-semitic slurs and constantly criticizing Israel in this case was being suspended from campus for a year.  But, let’s look at the wider picture.  Today it’s about Israel, tomorrow the racists, be they Arabs or Whites, could come for you.

I’m sure you’ve seen them, stumbling around like the failures they are and constantly bickering with each other. They’re simply bigots, even to each other. But we don’t care if they hate and hurt each other– simply the beauty of the self-destructiveness of hate. But what we do mind is if they cause trouble to the good people of the world, particularly minorities. Sure, we can allow them to spread their hate speech under the watchful eye of a tolerance-policing democratic authority, but we also have to be aware that hate has consequences.

For example: I recently recieved a comment about how Israel was guilty for the flotilla clash.  Utter trash that isn’t even recyclable. Using the investigative powers of the Information Superhighway, I searched this hateful user’s screen name and after hours and hours of searching, I found his personal information. Job, name, address, age, etc. I promptly called that person’s place of employment and alerted the bigot’s superior of their hateful actions online. They thanked me and told me that the person would be reprimanded, and probably fired for saying such disgusting things. I also gave the personal information to various pro-tolerance groups, three of them being the Southern Poverty Law Control Center, Anti-Racist Action, and One People’s Project. I then went to bed at 2:00AM after having meticulously tracked this bigot down. Hate has consequences.

People, particularly Ku-Klux-Klan or terrorist sympathizers, will tell me I am not respecting the right to free speech. One must keep in mind that the First Amendment applies only to the FEDERAL government, although very progressive groups have been eroding state’s rights for quite a while now. The First Amendment does not apply to speech that can be deemed hateful, as I illuminate in one of my earliest articles. Remember, that person was still able to communicate their feces-laden ideas; sick and perverted maligning that are obviously untrue upon a short introspection. I did not abridge this right, I merely engaged in my right to respond as one should when confronted with the most venomous of evils upon Earth. Why should one sit quietly and meekly when spat on by the flames of intolerance? Sometimes our action ought to be the hater’s education.

Allow the bigot to squeal and regurgitate ideas that intelligent people in academia take as jokes. But don’t let it end there; ensure that your local chapter of Anti-Racist Action or Skinheads Against Racial Prejudice are well aware of this person’s activities. Let that person fear for their life, and let that fear one day manifest into a love greater than that they have ever known. Violence shall be the fire that burns the vegetation of hatred, and the fertilizer shall allow the seeds of tolerance to be fertile and yield the fruit of pure love.